CVE-2003-0178
What it is
Multiple buffer overflows in Lotus Domino Web Server before 6.0.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via (1) the s_ViewName option in the PresetFields parameter for iNotes, (2) the Foldername option in the PresetFields parameter for iNotes, or (3) a long Host header, which is inserted into a long Location header and used during a redirect operation.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 14.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 14.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 10.0 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 14.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- IBM Lotus Domino Web Server 6.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 10.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2003-0178.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2003-0178. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/772817
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/6871
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/772817
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/6871
References
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2003-q1/0080.html
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2003-q1/0081.html
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2003-q1/0082.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=104550063431461&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=104550063431463&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=104550335103136&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=ntbugtraq&m=104558777331345&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=ntbugtraq&m=104558777531350&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=ntbugtraq&m=104558778331387&w=2
- http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2003-11.html
- http://www.ciac.org/ciac/bulletins/n-065.shtml
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/206361
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/542873
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/772817
- http://www.nextgenss.com/advisories/lotus-hostlocbo.txt
- http://www.nextgenss.com/advisories/lotus-inotesoflow.txt
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/6870
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/6871
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/11336
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/11337
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2003-q1/0080.html
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2003-q1/0081.html
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2003-q1/0082.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=104550063431461&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=104550063431463&w=2