CVE-2002-1486
What it is
Multiple buffer overflows in the IRC component of Trillian 0.73 and 0.74 allows remote malicious IRC servers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via (1) a large response from the server, (2) a JOIN with a long channel name, (3) a long "raw 221" message, (4) a PRIVMSG with a long nickname, or (5) a long response from an IDENT server.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 9.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 9.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 9.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Cerulean Studios Trillian 0.73
- Cerulean Studios Trillian 0.74
- Cerulean Studios Trillian 0.725
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2002-1486.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2002-1486. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-09/0258.html
- http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10151.php
- http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10163.php
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5769
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5777
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-09/0258.html
- http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10151.php
- http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10163.php
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5769
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5777
References
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-09/0258.html
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-09/0266.html
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-09/0268.html
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/ntbugtraq/2002-q3/0139.html
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/ntbugtraq/2002-q3/0140.html
- http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10150.php
- http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10151.php
- http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10163.php
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5765
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5769
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5777
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-09/0258.html
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-09/0266.html
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-09/0268.html
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/ntbugtraq/2002-q3/0139.html
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/ntbugtraq/2002-q3/0140.html
- http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10150.php
- http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10151.php
- http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10163.php
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5765
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5769
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5777