CVE-2001-1009
What it is
Fetchmail (aka fetchmail-ssl) before 5.8.17 allows a remote malicious (1) IMAP server or (2) POP/POP3 server to overwrite arbitrary memory and possibly gain privileges via a negative index number as part of a response to a LIST request.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 6.5% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 6.5% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 10.0 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 6.5% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-264
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Fetchmail ≤ 5.8.14
- Fetchmail 4.5.1
- Fetchmail 4.5.2
- Fetchmail 4.5.3
- Fetchmail 4.5.4
- Fetchmail 4.5.5
- Fetchmail 4.5.6
- Fetchmail 4.5.7
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 10.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2001-1009.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2001-1009. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2001-08/0118.html
- http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisories/other_advisory-1555.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-103.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3164
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3166
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2001-08/0118.html
- http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisories/other_advisory-1555.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-103.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3164
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3166
References
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2001-08/0118.html
- http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000419
- http://www.debian.org/security/2001/dsa-071
- http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/6965.php
- http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/security/2001/MDKSA-2001-072.php3
- http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisories/other_advisory-1555.html
- http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2001_026_fetchmail_txt.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-103.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3164
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3166
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2001-08/0118.html
- http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000419
- http://www.debian.org/security/2001/dsa-071
- http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/6965.php
- http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/security/2001/MDKSA-2001-072.php3
- http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisories/other_advisory-1555.html
- http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2001_026_fetchmail_txt.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-103.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3164
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3166