CVE-1999-1593
What it is
Windows Internet Naming Service (WINS) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connectivity loss) or steal credentials via a 1Ch registration that causes WINS to change the domain controller to point to a malicious server. NOTE: this problem may be limited when Windows 95/98 clients are used, or if the primary domain controller becomes unavailable.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 18.1% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- ReservedThe CVE id was reserved by its CNA
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 18.1% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.6 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 18.1% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-59
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Microsoft Windows 2000
- Microsoft Windows 95
- Microsoft Windows 98
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.6
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-1999-1593.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-1999-1593. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/ntbugtraq/1998-1999/msg00371.html
- http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0264.html
- http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0269.html
- http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0271.html
- http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0274.html
- http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0276.html
- http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0289.html
- http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0298.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/2221
- https://www2.sans.org/reading_room/whitepapers/win2k/185.php
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/ntbugtraq/1998-1999/msg00371.html
- http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0264.html
- http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0269.html
- http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0271.html
- http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0274.html
- http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0276.html
- http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0289.html
- http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2001/Jan/0298.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/2221
- https://www2.sans.org/reading_room/whitepapers/win2k/185.php