CVE-20XX-?
agent?

Server CVEs.

Published CVEs that affect server software, ranked by exploit odds.

165 CVEs · updated 2026-11-13 12:09 UTC

Reset all
  1. CVE-2026-12572

    Zoho Corporation ManageEngine DDI Central version below 6201 is vulnerable to SQL injection in HA replication username handling leading to command execution as the PostgreSQL service account.

    Injection Server

    7.2 HIGH 3% exploit odds No fix listed
  2. CVE-2026-126148

    A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HA join-request packets.

    Injection Server

    9.8 CRITICAL 2% exploit odds No fix listed
  3. CVE-2026-118116

    Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

    Injection Server

    7.0 HIGH 2% exploit odds No fix listed
  4. CVE-2026-17402

    IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to OS command injection. User-supplied input is not properly neutralized before it is passed to the operating system, which could allow commands to run on the underlying host.

    Injection Server

    9.9 CRITICAL 2% exploit odds No fix listed
  5. CVE-2026-119586

    SQLite command-line shell through 3.54.1 contains a command injection vulnerability in the .recover command that emits attacker-planted dot-commands stored in sqlite_schema.sql values verbatim. Attackers can craft a database whose schema holds a valid CREATE statement followed by a .shell or .system line, executing OS commands when victims pipe .recover output into sqlite3.

    Injection Server Sqlite

    8.5 HIGH 2% exploit odds No fix listed
  6. CVE-2026-118238

    The Tenda W18E web management server is vulnerable to OS command injection via the "diagnose" packet-capture feature due to improper validation of JSON fields. An authenticated user can inject shell metacharacters into the protocol or targetDevice fields, which are later concatenated into a tcpdump command and executed with root privileges. This vulnerability can be exploited without authentication if the device is in a factory-reset state.

    Injection Server

    7.2 HIGH 2% exploit odds No fix listed
  7. CVE-2026-126167

    A improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker with domain admin or admin privileges to delete users of other tenant domains on a paired FortiAuthenticator, execute arbitrary code as root or arbitrary CLI commands, and read or write arbitrary files as root via crafted HTTP requests to the administrative interface.

    Injection Server

    7.2 HIGH 2% exploit odds No fix listed
  8. CVE-2026-90868

    An OS command injection vulnerability in Progress Software WS_FTP Server versions prior to 2024.0.7 and 2025.0.4 on Windows could allow arbitrary command execution under certain configurations.

    Injection Server

    9.9 CRITICAL 1% exploit odds No fix listed
  9. CVE-2026-116369

    A vulnerability was identified in Sunwood-ai-labs github-kanban-mcp-server up to 0.4.0. Impacted is the function handleListIssues of the file src/handlers/issue-handlers.ts. Such manipulation of the argument state/labels leads to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. Upgrading to version 0.4.1 is recommended to address this issue. The name of the patch is 253d93bbdf7ee9fe42bd8fdf15feea93ae59cbae. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.

    Injection Server

    5.3 MEDIUM 1% exploit odds Fix listed
  10. CVE-2026-116109

    A vulnerability has been found in continuedev Continue 2.0.0. This vulnerability affects the function MCPManagerSingleton.setConnections of the file core/config/ConfigHandler.ts of the component MCP Server Transport. Such manipulation leads to os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

    Injection Server

    2.1 LOW 1% exploit odds No fix listed
  11. CVE-2026-90865

    An OS command injection vulnerability in Progress Software WS_FTP Server versions prior to 2024.0.7 and 2025.0.4 on Windows could allow arbitrary command execution with elevated privileges under certain configurations.

    Injection Server

    9.0 CRITICAL 1% exploit odds No fix listed
  12. CVE-2026-118149

    Improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Microsoft Exchange Server allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

    Injection Server

    8.8 HIGH 1% exploit odds No fix listed
  13. CVE-2026-118120

    Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

    Injection Server

    8.8 HIGH 1% exploit odds No fix listed
  14. CVE-2026-118109

    Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

    Injection Server

    8.8 HIGH 1% exploit odds No fix listed
  15. CVE-2026-118110

    Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

    Injection Server

    8.8 HIGH 1% exploit odds No fix listed
  16. CVE-2026-118477

    The ei_git_repo_url parameter in the Git remote configuration endpoint of KaliFast is vulnerable to OS Command Injection. This OS Command Injection vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker (free registration available) to execute arbitrary commands on the KaliFast server with www-data privileges. Fixed in version 2026061802.

    Injection Server

    8.7 HIGH 1% exploit odds Fix listed
  17. CVE-2026-126158

    A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1 may allow an authenticated administrator to execute unauthorized code or commands as root via specially crafted HTTP requests.

    Injection Server

    7.2 HIGH 1% exploit odds No fix listed
  18. CVE-2026-126144

    A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, FortiMail 7.2 all versions, FortiRecorder 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiRecorder 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiRecorder 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, FortiVoice 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiVoice 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, FortiVoice 7.2.0 through 7.2.5, FortiVoice 7.0.0 through 7.0.8 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests.

    Injection Server

    8.8 HIGH 1% exploit odds No fix listed
  19. CVE-2026-82119

    OS Command Injection Vulnerability in HiRDB. This issue affects HiRDB Server Version 10: from 10-00 before 10-12-01; HiRDB Server Version 9: from 09-00 through 09-66-22; HiRDB Server with Additional Function Version 9: from 09-00 through 09-66/V; HiRDB Server Version 9(32): from 09-02 through 09-66-22; HiRDB Server with Additional Function Version 9(32): from 09-00 through 09-66-/V.

    Injection Server

    9.8 CRITICAL 1% exploit odds No fix listed
  20. CVE-2026-122043

    repmgr 4.0.0 through 5.5.0 is affected by an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) in event notifications. When event_notification_command is configured, repmgr substitutes the %a (node name), %c (connection string) and %d (details) placeholders into the command and runs it through the shell. %a and %c are inserted without escaping, and %d escapes only double quotes, so shell command substitution still works inside the quoting the documentation recommends. The node name and connection string come from node records in the repmgr.nodes table. An attacker with the credentials of a non-superuser repmgr database user can write a crafted node record and run OS commands, as the operating system user that runs repmgr or repmgrd (usually postgres), on other cluster nodes that process an event using these placeholders. The %a placeholder of failover_validation_command has the same flaw. Deployments whose repmgr database user is a superuser gain no new capability, because a superuser can already run OS commands, and deployments that do not use these placeholders are not affected. The issue is fixed in repmgr 5.5.1. After upgrading, operators must remove any quotes they placed around these placeholders, because a placeholder left inside double quotes is still open to command injection.

    Injection Server

    6.0 MEDIUM 1% exploit odds Fix listed
  21. CVE-2026-78674

    The BPMN System REST APIs do not sufficiently validate input parameters, allowing authenticated users to submit crafted requests that can lead to the execution of arbitrary commands on the server. An authenticated user can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the product's runtime account. The scope of potential damage is contingent upon the permissions assigned to this account.

    Injection Server

    8.8 HIGH 1.0% exploit odds No fix listed
  22. CVE-2026-67544

    Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.71, Heym's workflow engine accepts an arbitrary Python code string in the playwrightCode field of a Playwright node. This string is written to a temporary .py file and executed directly by the backend process via subprocess.Popen([sys.executable, script_path]) with no sandboxing, AST validation, or role gate. Any authenticated user — including a freshly registered account — can achieve full remote code execution (RCE) on the backend host, running as the service process user (observed as root in the default Docker deployment). This issue has been patched in version 0.0.71.

    Injection Server

    8.8 HIGH 1.0% exploit odds Fix listed
  23. CVE-2026-126145

    A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated administrator with system-time read-write access to execute unauthorized code or commands as root.

    Injection Server

    7.2 HIGH 1.0% exploit odds No fix listed
  24. CVE-2026-126146

    A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, FortiMail 7.2.0 through 7.2.9, FortiRecorder 7.6.0, FortiRecorder 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiRecorder 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 may allow an authenticated privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via a specifically crafted archive account configuration.

    Injection Server

    7.2 HIGH 1.0% exploit odds No fix listed
  25. CVE-2026-116755

    Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') in the Orchestrator component of SoftIron HyperCloud allows an authenticated user with access to the management plane to execute arbitrary operating system commands on hypervisor hosts as the privileged orchestration user. Attacker-controlled virtual machine template content (for example, the VM DESCRIPTION field) is delivered to hosts through a shell here-document whose terminator is not quoted, so shell expansion and here-document terminator injection are performed on that content during virtual machine lifecycle operations such as deploy, migrate, and network setup. Exploitation requires valid credentials, access to the management plane (owning a virtual machine alone is not sufficient), and a lifecycle operation that reaches the affected host. This issue affects the Orchestrator component of SoftIron HyperCloud from 1.0 through 2.6.17 and is fixed in 2.6.18.

    Injection Server

    7.4 HIGH 0.9% exploit odds Fix listed
  26. CVE-2026-118105

    Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

    Injection Server

    8.8 HIGH 0.9% exploit odds No fix listed
  27. CVE-2026-118117

    Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

    Injection Server

    8.0 HIGH 0.9% exploit odds No fix listed
  28. CVE-2026-118118

    Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

    Injection Server

    8.0 HIGH 0.9% exploit odds No fix listed
  29. CVE-2026-118119

    Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

    Injection Server

    8.0 HIGH 0.9% exploit odds No fix listed
  30. CVE-2026-118112

    Improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

    Injection Server

    8.0 HIGH 0.9% exploit odds No fix listed
  31. CVE-2026-118113

    Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

    Injection Server

    8.0 HIGH 0.9% exploit odds No fix listed
  32. CVE-2026-116930

    Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in SQL Server allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

    Injection Server

    8.8 HIGH 0.9% exploit odds No fix listed
  33. CVE-2026-116102

    A vulnerability was determined in QuantGeekDev docker-mcp 0.1.0/0.2.0. The impacted element is the function _build_windows_command of the file docker_executor.py. This manipulation of the argument project_name causes os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely.

    Injection Server

    5.3 MEDIUM 0.9% exploit odds No fix listed
  34. CVE-2026-114278

    The che-machine-exec service constructs a shell command by concatenating user-controlled input (the username and namespace fields from the /exec/init and /exec/config JSON endpoints) into a double-quoted sh -c "echo "..." > ..." invocation without any escaping. When che-machine-exec is run with authentication disabled (its default), any network-reachable attacker can achieve remote code execution in containers che-machine-exec is configured to access, via shell command substitution ($(...) or backticks).

    Injection Server

    9.8 CRITICAL 0.9% exploit odds Fix listed
  35. CVE-2026-86047

    MariaDB server is a community developed fork of MySQL server. From 10.6.1 until 10.6.28, 10.11.19, 11.4.13, 11.8.9, 12.3.3, and 13.0.2, SHOW CREATE SERVER, SHOW CREATE USER, and mariadb-dump are affected because each does not consistently quote identifiers and values when serializing SQL. A low-privileged attacker can trigger the issue when an attacker-created object with crafted identifiers or values is included in SHOW output or a dump, then create an object with crafted identifiers or values so generated SQL contains injected statements and execute attacker-injected SQL when the poisoned output is applied. This issue is fixed in versions 10.6.28, 10.11.19, 11.4.13, 11.8.9, 12.3.3, and 13.0.2.

    Injection Server Mariadb

    7.7 HIGH 0.9% exploit odds Fix listed
  36. CVE-2026-95664

    Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') vulnerability in Apache Camel AWS2-s3 component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.8.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.2. For the object it uploads, reads or deletes, the camel-aws2-s3 producer takes the key from the CamelAwsS3Key message header and falls back to the keyName option configured on the endpoint only when that header is absent. Since 4.8.0, AWS2S3Utils.determineKey() also passed the resulting value to the Simple language whenever it contained ${ or $simple{, so that a route could use a dynamic key, and the evaluation applied to a value taken from the header as well as to the configured option. The header is not route configuration, however: the aws2-s3 consumer sets CamelAwsS3Key on the exchanges it creates to the key of the object it read, that is, the name of the object in the bucket. In a route that does nothing more than consume from one aws2-s3 endpoint and produce to another, the name of each consumed object therefore reached the producer, and a name containing either marker was evaluated as an expression, although the route author never asked for any evaluation, and configuring keyName on the producer did not prevent it, because the header took precedence. A key that a route copied into the header from other message content was evaluated in the same way. Anyone able to choose the name of an object in a bucket that such a route consumes, typically a principal allowed to upload to that bucket, could therefore have Simple expressions of their choosing evaluated in the Camel process. The Simple language can read JVM system properties, environment variables and configuration properties, which commonly carry credentials, and, where camel-bean is on the classpath, invoke methods on beans in the registry. The evaluated result became the key the producer used, so reading a value back additionally required the ability to see object names in the destination bucket, while a method invocation took effect without it; together with the need to name an object in a consumed bucket, this is why the severity is assessed medium. The bucket name went through the same evaluation, but the consumer only ever places the bucket configured on its own endpoint in a bucket header, never a value derived from a remote object, so the bucket name was not reachable in this way. Releases before 4.8.0 used the key from the header as given and are not affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.22.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.22.2. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.8.x to 4.17.x and 4.19.x to 4.21.x release lines reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix, so deployments on them must move to a supported release. After upgrading, a key or bucket name supplied through a message header is used literally, so a route that put an unevaluated Simple expression in the CamelAwsS3Key or CamelAwsS3OverrideBucketName header must evaluate it in the route instead, for example with setHeader and simple(), or configure it as the keyName or bucketName option of the endpoint. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, do not let a key derived from an object name or from other untrusted message content reach an aws2-s3 producer unchecked: in routes that pass exchanges from an aws2-s3 consumer to an aws2-s3 producer, either remove the CamelAwsS3Key header before the producer with removeHeader(“CamelAwsS3Key”), so that the keyName configured on the endpoint is used, or reject exchanges whose CamelAwsS3Key header contains ${ or $simple{. Configuring keyName alone is not a workaround, because the header takes precedence over it. As defence in depth, allow only trusted principals to write to buckets that Camel routes consume.

    Injection Server Apache Camel

    5.4 MEDIUM 0.8% exploit odds Fix listed
  37. CVE-2026-113378

    A security flaw has been discovered in mcollina mcp-ripgrep up to 0.4.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file src/index.ts of the component Advanced Search Tool. The manipulation of the argument fileType results in os command injection. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The code's own escapeShellArg on sibling arguments (skipped only for fileType) indicates that this is a CWE-78 oversight, not a documented design. The project maintainer cites the documentation: "This MCP server executes shell commands using the ripgrep tool. While efforts have been made to safely escape arguments, use caution when providing input, as it runs commands on your machine."

    Injection Server

    1.9 LOW 0.8% exploit odds No fix listed
  38. CVE-2026-125757

    mailcow: dockerized before 2026-11 contains a server-side template injection vulnerability that allows domain administrators to execute commands in the shared rspamd container by storing a malicious domain-wide footer. Attackers can embed a Jinja macro with an os.execute default value, rendered by the rspamd MOO_FOOTER prefilter, to read or inject mail for every tenant and disable filtering.

    Injection Server

    9.4 CRITICAL 0.8% exploit odds Fix listed
  39. CVE-2026-97693

    Yuxi is a large-model-based intelligent knowledge base and knowledge graph agent development platform. From 0.6.0.beta1 until 0.7.1, there is insufficient isolation between execution-capable Docker sandboxes and trusted application services. A low-privileged authenticated user who can execute commands in their own sandbox can reach other tenants' sandbox APIs, access their files and secrets, execute commands in active sandboxes, and enumerate, create, or delete sandboxes through the unauthenticated provisioner without knowing administrator, database, or MinIO credentials. Sandboxes can also reach shared internal services; if shipped default service credentials remain unchanged, an attacker can use them, and if the exposed PostgreSQL account is a superuser, obtain command execution in the PostgreSQL container. These paths can disclose or modify cross-tenant data and sandbox state or cause denial of service through sandbox deletion without a container escape or kernel vulnerability. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.7.1. Existing deployments must separately rotate persisted PostgreSQL, Neo4j, or MinIO credentials that were previously set to documented or shipped defaults because upgrading the Compose files does not automatically rotate them.

    Injection Server

    9.9 CRITICAL 0.8% exploit odds Fix listed
  40. CVE-2026-110193

    IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 could allow a remote attacker with a low-privileged authenticated account to cause the Agentic Assistant to generate or submit component code using these unblocked patterns, resulting in arbitrary operating system command execution on the server.

    Injection Server Langflow

    8.8 HIGH 0.8% exploit odds Fix listed
  41. CVE-2026-119713

    Paperclip 2026.403.0 before 2026.416.0 contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows agent API key holders to set cleanupCommand and teardownCommand via PATCH /api/execution-workspaces/:id. When the workspace is archived, cleanupExecutionWorkspaceArtifacts runs these commands through a shell as the Paperclip server process, executing attacker-chosen OS commands on the server host.

    Injection Server

    8.7 HIGH 0.8% exploit odds Fix listed
  42. CVE-2026-118115

    Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

    Injection Server

    7.5 HIGH 0.8% exploit odds No fix listed
  43. CVE-2026-118114

    Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in SQL Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

    Injection Server

    7.5 HIGH 0.8% exploit odds No fix listed
  44. CVE-2026-115785

    An SMTP command injection vulnerability in the data-source testing functionality of Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) allows an ordinary authenticated user with account options enabled to inject CR/LF into the emailAddress inserted into an SMTP envelope command by a JSON SOAP request. After a successful preliminary POP3 or IMAP login, Zimbra sends the injected commands to the selected SMTP service. If that service accepts the pipelined transaction, the attacker can submit mail with attacker-selected recipients, headers and body content without victim interaction. The vulnerable command-construction path is present in ZCS 10.1.16 and 10.1.20.

    Injection Server Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite

    4.3 MEDIUM 0.7% exploit odds Fix listed
  45. CVE-2026-55240

    Tianji is an open source analytics, uptime monitoring, and server status platform. Prior to 1.31.29, formatString() in src/server/utils/template.ts passes survey feedTemplate and monitor notification templates to lodash template(), while the default evaluate pattern remains enabled. A workspace administrator can store an evaluate block using the <% code %> form, and the public survey.submit endpoint renders a survey template when an unauthenticated user submits a response. The compiled template executes server-side JavaScript in the Tianji Node.js process, allowing command execution, secret disclosure, data modification, or service disruption. This issue is fixed in version 1.31.29.

    Injection Server

    9.1 CRITICAL 0.7% exploit odds Fix listed
  46. CVE-2026-113403

    ArmorX Spam developed by ArmorX Global Technology has a Command Injection vulnerability. Authenticated remote attackers can inject crafted commands into a specific parameter, thereby uploading malicious code to the server.

    Injection Server

    7.1 HIGH 0.7% exploit odds No fix listed
  47. CVE-2026-117573

    hagent through commit 761eec6 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows MCP clients to execute shell commands by injecting metacharacters into the args parameter of the hagent_arduino and hagent_esp32 tools. Attackers or prompt-injected agents can supply crafted args interpolated into arduino-cli and idf.py commands run with subprocess.run(shell=True) to execute commands as the MCP server user.

    Injection Server

    8.5 HIGH 0.7% exploit odds No fix listed
  48. CVE-2026-92207

    MindsDB OpenBBtable Code Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of MindsDB. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the OpenBBtable class. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute Python code. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-28388.

    Injection Server

    8.8 HIGH 0.7% exploit odds No fix listed
  49. CVE-2026-105014

    Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Azure Pipelines allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

    Injection Server

    9.1 CRITICAL 0.7% exploit odds No fix listed
  50. CVE-2026-117569

    Kali-GPT through commit a608c74 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in execute_tool() in kali_gpt/tools/mcp_server.py that allows MCP clients to run commands via unsanitized scanner parameters. Attackers or prompt-injected agents can embed shell metacharacters in parameters like target, ports, domain, wordlist, or url, executed via subprocess.run with shell=True as the MCP server user.

    Injection Server

    8.5 HIGH 0.7% exploit odds No fix listed

CVEs that affect server, sorted by how likely they are to be exploited (EPSS).