Other CVEs.

IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improperly controlled modification of object attributes. A user could set a field that should only be controlled by the system, which could lead to code execution.

Code execution

FreeSWITCH is a Software Defined Telecom Stack enabling the digital transformation from proprietary telecom switches to a software implementation that runs on any commodity hardware. Prior to 1.11.2, msrp_parse_buffer() subtracted delimiter framing from a peer-controlled short segment whose MSRP byte range ended in * without first proving the segment was long enough. The unsigned result wrapped near SIZE_MAX and reached switch_msrp_msg_set_payload() as both an allocation size and memcpy length, while related pointer arithmetic could read before the receive buffer. The listener is disabled by default in msrp.conf.xml, but any deployment enabling an MSRP TCP or TLS port parses this framing before authentication. An unauthenticated network peer can corrupt memory and crash FreeSWITCH, dropping all active calls, although remote code execution has not been demonstrated. This issue is fixed in version 1.11.2.

Code execution

In JetBrains CLion before 2026.2, 2026.1.4 code execution was possible in Safe Mode via Meson project settings

Code execution

In JetBrains CLion before 2026.2 code execution was possible in Safe Mode via JSON compilation database

Code execution

A missing integrity verification vulnerability exists in HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected system.

Code execution

MLflow PickleEvaluationArtifact Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of MLflow. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of pickle files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-29513.

Code execution

In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.4 notebook code could execute commands in the sidecar container via the mount broker

Code execution

Adobe Illustrator CC versions 23.1 and earlier have a binary planting vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to local code execution.

Code execution

IBM MQ 9.2.0.0 through 9.2.0.44 LTS, 9.3.0.0 through 9.3.0.42 LTS, 9.4.0.0 through 9.4.0.26 LTS, 9.4.0.0 through 9.4.5.1 CD, and 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.0.5 LTS and CD could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on a Managed File Transfer agent host due to improper validation of metadata used during script execution.

Code execution

In JetBrains Junie CLI before 26.8.24 command execution was possible via the Allow Similar Commands option

Code execution

GeoNode is a geospatial content management system, a platform for the management and publication of geospatial data. Prior to 5.0.3, specially crafted requests can circumvent GeoNode upload service validation, allowing a low-privileged remote user to store and serve malicious files. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.3.

Code execution

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 code execution was possible via symlinks in an imported settings archive

Code execution

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3, 2026.2.4, 2026.1.5.1, 2025.3.6.2 code execution was possible in untrusted projects via script engine discovery

Code execution

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 code execution in untrusted projects via a configured ShellCheck path

Code execution

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3, 2026.2.4 code execution was possible in untrusted projects via the Terraform tool path setting

Code execution

In JetBrains CLion before 2026.3, 2026.2.4.1 code execution was possible in Safe Mode via a crafted GDB server debug profile

Code execution

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3, 2026.2.2 code execution was possible in Safe Mode via project-controlled JVM options of the build process

Code execution

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 code execution was possible in Safe Mode via UI Designer form file

Code execution

Improper isolation in the Avast sandbox on Windows allows a local, low-privileged attacker executing inside the sandbox to access COM interfaces to the Task Scheduler service, escape containment, and execute code with elevated privileges outside the sandbox. The sandbox virtualizes file system and registry access but does not adequately restrict COM interface access to Task Scheduler. A process inside the sandbox can instantiate COM objects bound to Task Scheduler functionality and invoke methods to schedule and execute tasks on the host system. The Task Scheduler COM pathway is not blocked by the sandbox policy, allowing arbitrary code execution in the host security context. This escape vector bypasses the sandbox's intended process and file isolation boundaries and can be chained with other host-level privilege escalation techniques.

Code execution

MLflow SHAP load_explainer Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of MLflow. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the loading of SHAP explainer models. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-30301.

Code execution

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 command execution was possible via control characters in terminal command completion

Code execution

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 code execution was possible in untrusted projects via the Terraform File Watchers

Code execution

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 code execution via the document import was possible in untrusted projects

Code execution

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3, 2026.2.4 command execution via a hidden run control in the Markdown preview was possible

Code execution

IBM Process Mining 2.0.0 through 2.2.1 could allow an authenticated user to upload a file with dangerous types that could be executed by another user if opened.

Code execution

Improper restriction of XML external entity reference vulnerability in TÜBİTAK BİLGEM Software Technologies Research Institute İmzager allows Serialized Data External Linking. This issue affects İmzager: from 2.10.5 before 2.10.7.

Code execution

In JetBrains WebStorm before 2026.3, 2026.2.4 code execution was possible in untrusted projects via the Angular CLI schematics loader

Code execution

A high privileged remote attacker can upload arbitrary files to a guessable location. This can result in a loss of availability and might be chained with other vulnerabilities.

Code execution

A locally authenticated user can achieve privilege escalation via an insecure configuration that leads to unauthorized code execution. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with an admin-privileged service account.

Code execution

SAP Host Agent does not sufficiently validate certain inputs. Under certain condition, an attacker with low privileges could abuse the affected functionality to influence an internal component into loading a malicious file under a privileged account. Successful exploitation could lead to persistent code execution, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability.

Code execution

Ghostscript before 10.08.0 contains a -dSAFER bypass vulnerability in the .putgstringcopy procedure in gs_fonts.ps, which calls the privileged .forceput operator without checking operand types. Attackers can supply crafted PostScript or PDF documents that trigger a type error, recover .forceput via a custom error handler, and cause a use-after-free across save/restore to execute arbitrary code.

Code execution

Unsafe reflection in the error mitigation schema validation in Amazon Braket Schemas before 1.32.2 might allow a remote authenticated user with S3 write access to the quantum task output location to execute arbitrary code on any machine that retrieves the quantum task results via a crafted task result document. We recommend you upgrade to amazon-braket-schemas version 1.32.2 or later.

Code execution Amazon amazon-braket-schemas

A remote code execution vulnerability exists in HPE Morpheus Software.

Code execution

Venere is installed outside Program Files and loads/registers unsigned components from locations where an unprivileged user may create files.

Code execution